Download PGN of May ’25 Daring Defences games
>> Previous Update >>
The Benko Gambit Declined: 4 Nd2 bxc4 5 e4 e6 [A57]
I used to think of 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5 3 d5 b5 4 Nd2 as a positionally decent sideline, but nowadays it seems fully defanged by 4...bxc4 5 e4 e6!:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
After 6 Bxc4 Be7 7 Ne2 exd5 8 exd5 d6 9 0-0 0-0 10 Nc3 Nbd7 Black didn’t have any particular problems and was soon able to play actively in Velten, P - Lagarde, M.
The Benko Gambit: 4 cxb5 a6 5 e3 axb5 6 Bxb5 Qa5+ 7 Nc3 Bb7 [A57]
The latest engines suggest that after 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5 3 d5 b5 4 cxb5 a6 White’s two best moves are to take on a6 or go 5 e3. Then a pretty critical line runs 5...axb5 6 Bxb5 Qa5+ 7 Nc3 Bb7 8 Bd2 Qb6 9 Nf3 Nxd5 10 a4 e6:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
White has a few options here and opted for the uncompromising gambit 11 e4!? Nxc3 12 Bxc3 Bxe4 before later being gradually outplayed ahead of rather collapsing in So, W - Praggnanandhaa, R.
The Benko Gambit: 4 cxb5 a6 5 bxa6 g6 6 Nc3 Bg7 7 e4 0-0 [A58]
The modern way of playing the Benko is, of course, based around meeting 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5 3 d5 b5 4 cxb5 a6 5 bxa6 not with 5...Bxa6, but rather 5...g6 6 Nc3 Bg7 7 e4 0-0:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In this tabiya White must decided how aggressive he or she is feeling. The positional path is 8 Nf3 Qa5 9 Bd2 Bxa6 10 Be2, but Black has more than one route to emerging with sufficient and standard Benko compensation here, as we’ll see in Lesiege, A - Bischoff, K.
The direct and critical path is 8 e5!? Ne8 9 h4! when it seems that Black can get away with 9...Bxe5!, so should probably grab the pawn. Then 10 Bh6 Qa5! is a new move for us:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We’ll explore it in fair detail in LCZero - Stockfish, the notes to which reveal what happened when the two leading engines also reached this position with colours reversed.
The Dutch: 2 Bg5 g6 3 e3 Bg7 4 h4 [A80]
Meeting 1 d4 f5 2 Bg5 g6 as White with 3 e3 Bg7 then 4 h4 feels a little strange to me, in part because 4...h6 5 Bf4 d6 is an obvious and decent counter for Black, and if 6 Bc4 Nf6:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Black is all set to follow up with ...e6, then ...Qe7 and ...e5, thereby obtaining a relatively comfortable set-up, as we’ll see in Sargsyan, S - Klimkowski, J.
Leningrad Dutch: 7 b3 e5 [A87]
For a long time it was thought that 1 d4 f5 2 Nf3 Nf6 3 g3 g6 4 Bg2 Bg7 5 0-0 0-0 6 c4 d6 7 b3 was a decent alternative to 7 Nc3. Black has deployed many different approaches here over the years, but 7...e5! 8 dxe5 dxe5 just looks like a good one:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
With ...e4 imminent, White already needs to be accurate to maintain equality here, and he was quickly destroyed by the world no.1. in Baltabaev, T - Carlsen, M.
Leningrad Dutch: 6 c4 d6 7 Nc3 c6 8 Qb3 [A88]
After 1 d4 f5 2 g3 Nf6 3 c4 g6 4 Bg2 Bg7 5 Nf3 0-0 6 0-0 d6 7 Nc3 both sides have several options, including 7...c6 8 Qb3 when 8...Na6 9 Bf4 is all fairly natural:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here 9...Qb6 looks like an obvious and good counter, which after 10 Qc2 saw Black quickly beginning to provoke with 10...Be6!? in Goganov, A - Rapport, R.
I’m sure Simon will be only too happy to bring you more daring Dutch dynamism over the coming months. Enjoy! Richard
>> Previous Update >>
If you have any questions, either leave a message on the Daring Defences Forum, or subscribers can email me at support@chesspublishing.com.